Rain tally for 2012
In contrast to 2011, 2012 was a drier year – especially the three months August to October. 709 mm (27.9 inches) of rain were recorded for the year compared to a long term average of 790 mm (31 inches) for Armidale.
Monthly rainfall tallies (in millimetres) for the past 11 years, as measured 20 km (12.5 miles) east of Armidale, NSW.
Year Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Total 2002 50.0 80.0 78.7 3.5 4.3 21.9 10.3 58.2 26.7 25.0 83.2 75.6 517.4 2003 51.6 144.5 52.7 108.7 39.1 31.8 18.9 23.0 5.7 91.3 55.9 71.1 694.3 2004 192.1 77.8 65.2 22.4 5.4 20.4 43.3 49.6 45.9 111.2 69.0 133.8 836.1 2005 92.9 66.3 16.2 13.2 18.8 82.6 20.9 13.4 87.1 60.2 154.3 98.7 724.6 2006 109.5 115.2 110.2 22.5 3.6 45.8 46.4 30.8 44.8 29.8 133.6 43.8 736.0 2007 98.1 137.1 95.4 43.6 21.7 39.9 8.7 105.4 13.8 95.7 102.8 127.7 889.9 2008 133.6 203.0 3.8 68.9 10.9 60.4 25.8 35.0 54.5 57.1 119.4 61.2 833.6 2009 67.8 160.4 56.6 67.1 121.1 46.1 23.4 18.2 31.3 53.7 52.2 138.4 836.3 2010 134.7 63.4 86.0 53.9 47.3 38.0 68.2 48.8 59.1 59.0 128.6 67.1 854.1 2011 151.6 58.4 87.8 69.3 50.6 156.5 11.7 76.4 70.9 64.3 241.2 116.4 1155.1 2012 122.3 75.6 52.4 55.0 10.7 43.1 75.8 12.8 8.2 14.2 128.4 110.7 709.2
Avg 109.5 107.4 64.1 48.0 30.3 53.3 32.1 42.9 40.7 60.1 115.3 95.0 798.8
The 135 year average for Armidale (in millimetres) is:
Avg 104.5 87.1 65.0 45.9 44.4 56.9 49.2 48.4 51.6 67.8 80.4 89.2 790.1
Rain tally for 2011
My, 2011 was a wet year. 1155 mm (45.5 inches) of rain recorded for the year, compared to a long term average of 790 mm (31 inches). The higher-than-average months of note were June, November and December. Thanks La Niña.
Monthly rainfall tallies (in millimetres) for the past 10 years, as measured 20 km (12.5 miles) east of Armidale, NSW.
Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Total
2002 50.0 80.0 78.7 3.5 4.3 21.9 10.3 58.2 26.7 25.0 83.2 75.6 517.4
2003 51.6 144.5 52.7 108.7 39.1 31.8 18.9 23.0 5.7 91.3 55.9 71.1 694.3
2004 192.1 77.8 65.2 22.4 5.4 20.4 43.3 49.6 45.9 111.2 69.0 133.8 836.0
2005 92.9 66.3 16.2 13.2 18.8 82.6 20.9 13.4 87.1 60.2 154.3 98.7 724.6
2006 109.5 115.2 110.2 22.5 3.6 45.8 46.4 30.8 44.8 29.8 133.6 43.8 735.0
2007 98.1 137.1 95.4 43.6 21.7 39.9 8.7 105.4 13.8 95.7 102.8 127.7 889.9
2008 133.6 203.0 3.8 68.9 10.9 60.4 25.8 35.0 54.5 57.1 119.4 61.2 833.6
2009 67.8 160.4 56.6 67.1 121.1 46.1 23.4 18.2 31.3 53.7 52.2 138.4 836.3
2010 134.7 63.4 86.0 53.9 47.3 38.0 68.2 48.8 59.1 59.0 128.6 67.1 854.1
2011 151.6 58.4 87.8 69.3 50.6 156.5 11.7 76.4 70.9 64.3 241.2 116.4 1155.1
The 135 year average for Armidale (in millimetres) is:
Avg 104.5 87.1 65.0 45.9 44.4 56.9 49.2 48.4 51.6 67.8 80.4 89.2 790.1
“Pro HDR”, an excellent photography app for iPhone
It takes a lot to impress me. I prefer “quality” over “cheap” when I purchase a product – this isn’t to say that a product can’t be both, though. “Pro HDR” by eyeApps LLC, falls into the latter category.
Photographs, as made by the technology found it today’s cameras, aren’t very good when capturing scenes which have a High Dynamic Range (HDR). Such scenes will typically have areas that are extremely bright, and areas that are very dark. Cameras can do a reasonable job of capturing detail in one or other of those areas, but not both at the same time.
That’s where the concept of HDR photography comes in to play. The idea is that if the camera makes several images, one after the other and each one exposed slightly differently (between one and two stops apart), then collectively they will have captured all the detail in a given scene.
Sophisticated software exists whereby these several images can be overlaid and the software selects which part of each image it will use, or even merge a few images and extrapolate those parts it wants. Tone mapping may also be applied.
Now, enter stage left, the iPhone.
Mobile phones have become part of the everyday lives of many people; in particular, the camera found thereon is used to record minutiae of everyday life. But most mobile phone cameras aren’t very sophisticated – they’re built to a price.
Like their bigger brothers, these cameras aren’t very good at recording detail in the bright and the dark parts on a scene.
That’s where “Pro HDR” for the iPhone comes to the fore, and is worth much more than you pay for it.
In my opinion “Pro HDR” operates best on “live” images – that is to say, in place of the Camera app already found on the iPhone. “Pro HDR”, when operating in automatic mode, will determine the brightest and the darkest parts of a scene, and then make two images, one exposed for the bright, and one for the dark. It then creates a blend of the two to give a single “HDR” version.
So, I purchased “Pro HDR” then installed it on my iPhone 4 (it also works with iPhone 3GS and iPod Touch 4G) and put it to the test.
Three images follow. The first is the image made when exposing for the brightest part of the scene – in this case, the clouds. Details of the clouds are clearly visible.
The next image is one which has been exposed for the darker parts of the image – in this case it’s pretty much everything other than the clouds. As you might expect, the sky is overexposed and lacks detail.
The third image is the composite automatically created by “Pro HDR” and which is an amalgam of the previous two images.
I am impressed! And the cost? $2.49 in the Australian iTunes store. Definitely one the the few real bargains in life.
[All of the above images are as taken by "Pro HDR", no adjustments were made other than to resize the images.]
Angus and Robertson. Good customer relationship management, or what?
Angus & Robertson (the booksellers) have a brand new web site. It’s a vast improvement over the previous one – and that’s great – except … they’ve not transferred any of the previously registered users, or records of those users’ previous purchases. From their signin page:
“PLEASE NOTE: If you used the old Angus & Robertson web site you will need to re-register your details below. Our new site does not contain any information you registered with us previously and does not have any information about any orders you may have placed previously.”
There’s no apology, no explanation, no conciliatory statement, just a cold announcement of fact. They’ve made a (hopefully calculated) business decision here, that it would be cheaper and/or easier to leave the flotsam or jetsam behind and start afresh, but at what overall cost?
Do you see the problem with their customer relationship management? Can you imagine, from a customer’s perspective, the outcry if Amazon did exactly this?
[I acknowledge that my comment makes the assumption that they previously had a nontrivial number of customers who registered and who made purchases].
To flash, or not to flash, that is the question.
Much has been written of late about Apple not supporting Adobe flash on its newly announced iPad. Not that it supports flash on its iPhones either, for that matter. Many people seem to think that Apple has an obligation to support flash because flash is so ubiquitous. Apple believes, or, at least, its publicly held stance is, that Adobe flash is too buggy and unstable.
My own view is that content providers are (or should be) more interested in maximising the number of eyeballs viewing their content rather than only utilising a single technology that a subset of consumers will see.
In order to be more aware of just exactly where the flash content lay, I installed the ClickToFlash plugin for the Safari web browser. ClickToFlash will block flash-based material from loading automatically, and will offer you the option of viewing it by clicking on the icon that’s presented to you in place of the flash content. Further, ClickToFlash will offer you the option of playing that blocked material via Quicktime, rather than as flash, if that’s possible.
In short, I’ve discovered that I’ve yet to find a single piece of flash-based content that I really, really wanted to view. Those YouTube videos that I did want to view were able to be displayed in-situ via QuickTime.
I’m pretty sure that when the iPad comes along, I won’t be crying in my tea about the lack of flash-playing capability.
iPad: now the small print (or no print?)
Now the finer details are emerging. The small print. I’m so much a part of the global community that I continue to forget that most (not all) US-based corporations are US-centric.
Yesterday Steve Jobs introduced the iPad to the world (but really just the USA). The single most anticipated feature for me was the iBooks app. That’s the feature that will leap-frog the iPad above and beyond Amazon’s kindle.
And then what happens? Apple’s Australian web site, after it finally got the iPad page up, tell us in the footnotes that iBooks is available in the US only. The New Zealand site says the same. Apple’s UK site avoids the issue by not mentioning iBooks at all.
I do understand the reasons. It comes down to territorial publishing rights (and that’s a whole different debate). But my issue with Steve Jobs is that of expectation management. My expectation was built up during his presentation. Now he’s failed me.
The world hasn’t fallen in though. Once the dust has settled we’ll no doubt hear about local arrangements for book availability. Amazon has the same issues so it’s nothing new.
Tangential niggle: so if Australia has a “free trade” agreement with the USA, why isn’t there free trade.
You no full-feedee? Me no subscribee!
My name is Gordon and I have a confession. I’m a compulsive subscriber to RSS feeds. I read too many blogs. Too many blogs that cover the same subject matter. To feed my habit I use Google Reader. Google Reader collects and collates all the content from all those blogs to which I subscribe. It’s easy to use – a bit too easy.
I used to subscribe to 360 blogs. I’m recovering now. My subscription count is down to 202. It’s better. I almost have the time to read the material from those 202 RSS feeds.
I have a quirk, though. It you only publish a partial-content RSS feed in the hope of making me click through to your actual blog to read the rest of the article, then – FAIL! I don’t do partial feeds. If you think you need me to click through so that I’ll see the advertising that you have on your blog to generate income, then – FAIL! You don’t need me to go to the blog – if you really must, you can insert advertisements (eg Google ads) into the RSS feed.
The only time I visit a blog in person is if it’s a click-through from another blog (via Google Reader, of course), or from Twitter (for example). If I like what I see, I might subscribe – if it’s a full feed.
